evan.musing << current

Syntax errors are a part of life for programmers. The language of the computer, no matter how flexible the language, is very picky.

And thus how the language communicates back to the user about what it didn’t understand is important, because time is spent in this phase, no matter the skill level of the programmer.

In Ruby specifically, MRI’s parser (and by extension the melbourne parser Rubinius uses) use yacc, and thus suffer from syntax errors which can be particularly difficult to understand. One particular syntax error that commonly occurs is when there is an ‘end’ missing from an expression. This results in the dreaded syntax error, unexpected $end, expecting kEND message.

Here is a quick example:

class Spaghetti
  class Sause
     def add(plate)
        while more?
           plate << self
     end
  end
end

Now, this is a short example and so spotting the error is fairly easy. But this error typically occurs when you’re working on a 600 line file with multiple classes inside classes and with complicated logic, making it quite difficult to find.

This evening, I decided to try and at least help make this easier to find. So now in Rubinius, rather than

syntax error, unexpected $end, expecting kEND

you get

missing ‘end’ for ‘class’ started on line 1.

Thats a big improvement, because now first off, it’s fairly clearly communicated what is wrong, i.e. that you’ve forgotten an ‘end’. In addition, it tells you what element still required a ‘end’, in this case, a ‘class’ on line 1.

Now, this is far from perfect. It’s pointing you to the element that was unclosed, rather than the one that you actually forgot the ‘end’ on. But it at least is now pointing you to the chunk of code that is the offending code. In practice, this can be a big help.

In the future, it might be possible to try and use indentation to try and narrow down where the missing ‘end’ should be. But for now, every little bit helps.