Comments on: Performance benchmarks http://blog.fallingsnow.net/2007/08/24/performance-benchmarks/ life and tech stuff by Evan Phoenix Tue, 24 Aug 2010 02:53:22 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: hmm http://blog.fallingsnow.net/2007/08/24/performance-benchmarks/#comment-5081 hmm Wed, 28 Nov 2007 16:09:39 +0000 http://evanphx.wordpress.com/2007/08/24/performance-benchmarks/#comment-5081 so... what is MRI ?? so… what is MRI ??

]]> By: Charles Comstock http://blog.fallingsnow.net/2007/08/24/performance-benchmarks/#comment-1647 Charles Comstock Thu, 27 Sep 2007 01:17:13 +0000 http://evanphx.wordpress.com/2007/08/24/performance-benchmarks/#comment-1647 Any chance you could just add the script to generate the comparison to the rubinius distribution? I guess actually it might belong in whatever shared repositories of specifications that exists between rubinius and jruby. Any chance you could just add the script to generate the comparison to the rubinius distribution?

I guess actually it might belong in whatever shared repositories of specifications that exists between rubinius and jruby.

]]> By: Stephen Waits http://blog.fallingsnow.net/2007/08/24/performance-benchmarks/#comment-1321 Stephen Waits Tue, 18 Sep 2007 04:08:00 +0000 http://evanphx.wordpress.com/2007/08/24/performance-benchmarks/#comment-1321 Hey Evan, have any time to update these? We're anxious out here! Hey Evan, have any time to update these? We’re anxious out here!

]]> By: Brendan http://blog.fallingsnow.net/2007/08/24/performance-benchmarks/#comment-605 Brendan Sat, 25 Aug 2007 23:40:45 +0000 http://evanphx.wordpress.com/2007/08/24/performance-benchmarks/#comment-605 Hey, good work. This looks great. Hey, good work. This looks great.

]]> By: evanphx http://blog.fallingsnow.net/2007/08/24/performance-benchmarks/#comment-578 evanphx Fri, 24 Aug 2007 22:08:55 +0000 http://evanphx.wordpress.com/2007/08/24/performance-benchmarks/#comment-578 I'll probably start running these more often, and I'll add a ratio column. Yep, the unit is seconds to run and smaller is better. I'll remember to put a legend up next time. I’ll probably start running these more often, and I’ll add a ratio column. Yep, the unit is seconds to run and smaller is better. I’ll remember to put a legend up next time.

]]> By: Jamie Flournoy http://blog.fallingsnow.net/2007/08/24/performance-benchmarks/#comment-577 Jamie Flournoy Fri, 24 Aug 2007 22:06:00 +0000 http://evanphx.wordpress.com/2007/08/24/performance-benchmarks/#comment-577 It would be nice to see a Rubinius/MRI ratio column. Also I'm guessing that the result units are seconds (vs. iterations, work done, etc.) and smaller numbers are better, but this isn't stated anywhere (on this page). It would be nice to see a Rubinius/MRI ratio column. Also I’m guessing that the result units are seconds (vs. iterations, work done, etc.) and smaller numbers are better, but this isn’t stated anywhere (on this page).

]]> By: Michael Latta http://blog.fallingsnow.net/2007/08/24/performance-benchmarks/#comment-575 Michael Latta Fri, 24 Aug 2007 20:52:15 +0000 http://evanphx.wordpress.com/2007/08/24/performance-benchmarks/#comment-575 These numbers look great. For a first cut this is very acceptable. Now if it could only run Rails apps. But, that will come in time. These numbers look great. For a first cut this is very acceptable. Now if it could only run Rails apps. But, that will come in time.

]]> By: Ezra http://blog.fallingsnow.net/2007/08/24/performance-benchmarks/#comment-573 Ezra Fri, 24 Aug 2007 19:45:36 +0000 http://evanphx.wordpress.com/2007/08/24/performance-benchmarks/#comment-573 These are very promising benchmarks. A lot of improvement over the last published benches. Great job to everyone working on rubinius. These are very promising benchmarks. A lot of improvement over the last published benches. Great job to everyone working on rubinius.

]]> By: Keebler http://blog.fallingsnow.net/2007/08/24/performance-benchmarks/#comment-572 Keebler Fri, 24 Aug 2007 19:42:13 +0000 http://evanphx.wordpress.com/2007/08/24/performance-benchmarks/#comment-572 That's is seriously really impressive. I tried to contribute a little in the beginning, but had trouble and since I was working in an odd environment it was hard for me to post patches. I'd forgotten since then and worked on some interpreters of my own, but the progress is really inspiring, and I'm pretty impressed with rubini.us, so I'm going to make a point of taking another swing at helping out. Keep up the good work! That’s is seriously really impressive.
I tried to contribute a little in the beginning, but had trouble and since I was working in an odd environment it was hard for me to post patches. I’d forgotten since then and worked on some interpreters of my own, but the progress is really inspiring, and I’m pretty impressed with rubini.us, so I’m going to make a point of taking another swing at helping out.

Keep up the good work!

]]>